OPINION THE REAL WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH CAPITAL IN WASHINGTON D.C., NORTH AMERICA Written on Wednesday 8th April 2026

OPINION


THE REAL WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WITH CAPITAL IN WASHINGTON D.C., NORTH AMERICA

Written on Wednesday 8th April 2026 


Written by Abiodun Mohammed Adeyemi Ajijola

It is my strong opinion that the real war against the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America is not with the Islamic Republic of Iran or any other nation but individuals and entities which desire to control the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America leveraging any means necessary. That is the real war and the people of the United States of America, with capital in Washington D.C., North America, need to understand this. Thinking of any nation or group of nations as adversaries, in my opinion, misses the point and does not allow the people of the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America to see and identify the real threat and danger. This write-up will hopefully lift that veil, open the eyes of the people and make it abundantly clear the war that the United States of America, with capital in Washington D.C., North America cannot afford to lose.

It is my opinion that the war against the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America, which needs to be legally and accurately thwarted is the war to implicate, influence by force and capture the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America from a series of wrongdoings and illegalities which open the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America to capture and remote control which if completely successful could be better not imagined. That shall not prevail, through any means, manner or form.

Implicating the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America

It is my opinion that implicating the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America is effected by influencing the nation to act in ways and with means that create disaffection for the nation as a whole and the people. These are sometimes more apparent and in other instances are more clandestine. Some instances will be made available.

The war with the Islamic Republic of Iran may be seen as a power move to increase control and influence of the United States of America with its capital in Washington D.C., North America in the Middle East. Some may even postulate that the United States wants to control the Straight of Hormuz or intends to have control of a considerable portion of the shipping in and out of the Middle East. With some of the pronouncements relating to the Panama Canal, it may appear that this is part of a larger objective. Juxtaposing this with the tariffs on many nations it may appear as an attempt to gain a considerable increase in and control of global trade.

'An average of approximately 20–20.3 million barrels of petroleum and crude oil pass through the Strait of Hormuz daily. This volume represents roughly 25% of the world’s total seaborne oil trade and about 20% of global daily oil supply, making it the world's most critical maritime energy chokepoint.'

https://www.google.com/search?q=how+much+oil+from+middle+east+is+through+straight+of+hormuz&oq=how+much+oil+from+middle+east+is+through+straight+of+hormuz&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOTIJCAEQIRgKGKABMgkIAhAhGAoYoAHSAQkyMzUxOWowajSoAgGwAgE&client=ms-android-huawei&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

Under 20% of the oil exports passing through the Straight of Hormuz are destined for locations outside the Continent of Asia while the rest is for Asia. What this means is that if the United States defeated Iran and controlled the Straight of Hormuz directly and or indirectly with a friendly government, this would mean direct influence over a large volume of oil intended for Asia. Considering other factors, it becomes clear why this may be concerning for some and may not make the United States look so good. 

Some may look at prior events and may be of the opinion that the capture of the elected President of Venezuela was to consolidate control of the crude oil resources of Venezuela, which may show some premeditation with the war with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Because the United States not only has huge crude oil deposits, adding that with that of Venezuela would perhaps mean the United States would not be adversely affected irrespective of the situation in the Middle East. Since the war, in my opinion, is illegal and unprovoked, it makes it appear as well planned and part of a thorough strategy. This, in my opinion, doesn't look good and may be exactly what those responsible want. The reference to Christians as relating to the Federal Republic of Nigeria helps to reinforce this. This is because, if the airstrikes had continued longer, and there was a considerable outcome, it is feasible that there would have been increased dependence on the United States for helping to thwart terrorism, which may eventually lead to increased trade, especially petroleum products with Nigeria. This would mean another location with huge crude oil deposits available to the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America, not in the Middle East.

Me who write this physically have earlier written about how the war in Gaza could also be seen in some ways as implicating.


RECOMMENDATION

Board of Peace

Saturday 17th, January 2026

https://recommendationsofabiodunmaajijola.blogspot.com/2026/01/recommendation-board-of-peace-saturday.html



RECOMMENDATION

ESCAPING ENTRAPMENTS 

Written from 22nd to 23rd January 2026 within a 24-hour time period under terrible psychological aggression
causing intense biological headaches all through, lethargy, fatigue and an increase in physique temperature at times.

https://recommendationsofabiodunmaajijola.blogspot.com/2026/01/recommendation-escaping-entrapments.html

As relates to Cuba, it may be possible to perceive that the United States of America, with capital in Washington D.C., North America, wants to gain a firm grip on the nation to ensure that it can not be used as a launchpad against the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America. The Cuban missile crisis of the 1960s shows that this is a serious concern to the United States. However, this may make it appear that the United States is expecting some reprisals from some of these actions or other actions which require securing such a location. This also could be reinforced with the stated need by the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America to control Greenland for national security reasons by leveraging force if necessary.

What this all looks like, in my opinion, is that the United States of America, with capital in Washington D.C., North America, may be trying to capture and or control locations with an effort to increase its geopolitical and geographical influence across the Universe, even if it is against the will of the legal leadership of some of those locations. It is my opinion that this is made to make the United States of America, with capital in Washington D.C., North America, appear oppressive and on a universal territorial pursuit. This, in my opinion, is not the intention of the United States, but it is feasible to see how it could be seen that way.

Military Risks

This, in my opinion, is one of the greatest risks in this war being waged against the United States of America with its capital in Washington D.C., North America.

The United States made considerable deployments to Venezuela and has retained a considerable amount of military capability to ensure it keeps its control over Venezuela.

The United States of America, with its capital in Washington, D.C., North America, mobilised so many military capabilities to the Middle East in order to prosecute its war against the Islamic Republic of Iran.

There were some military personnel who did airstrikes in Nigeria. If the United States did deploy to capture Greenland, which it didn't, while having such a deployment in Venezuela and the Middle East, off the coast of West Africa, it only appears as though the United States military is being spread intentionally thin in locations where its military absence may cause a collapse in its influence in such locations where the actions of the military of the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America may have been illegal in whole and or in part. If this trend were to continue it would further spread the United States military to a point in my opinion where the United States would not be able to adequately respond to a very real threat somewhere else which may be existential.

Security operations which are illegal may expose the United States to serious risks and may cause disaffection for the United States which shall not prevail through any means, manner or form.

In conclusion, it is my opinion that the United States is somehow being set up, though this is very clear would have the involvement of some people within and outside of the United States.

The people of the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America need to understand that those trying to conquer the United States of America with capital in Washington D.C., North America have figured out that this could almost never be possible in any direct way or means. However, what it appears is, and perhaps, has been happening for decades is an attempt to gain control over the power and control structure of the United States because that would be very precarious. That shall not prevail through any means, manner or form.

Control over the power structure or part of it means that the United States could be made to act in ways that even the American people do not want, such as illegal invasions. Because wars are also about reputations and those who get the United States into illegal wars know that getting out of such wars requires some level of reputational slide unless outright victory is achieved. Therefore, war is being used to try to entice and trap the United States. That shall not prevail through any means, manner or form.

This is written at great risk to my life, but me who write this physically felt it was necessary to make this legally and accurately known.